Stop rebuilding seller offer grids from a stack of PDFs.
OfferProof turns multiple purchase-offer PDFs into an agent-reviewed comparison packet with source snippets, risk flags, and a seller-ready review grid before the decision window closes.
Landing-page validation only. Workflow support for agent review, not legal advice or autonomous offer acceptance.
seller offer review
5 offers · 11 fields need confidence
Offer B
$42k higher net · appraisal gap unclear
Offer D
Fast close · inspection waived · lender letter attached
Offer A
Escalation clause found on page 14
Source proof preview
“Closing timeline: 21 days” links to the exact PDF snippet, with ambiguous financing terms queued for agent review.
Narrow customer
Listing agents, transaction coordinators, and small teams managing 3–15 simultaneous purchase-offer PDFs for one seller.
Paid problem
Deadline pressure plus manual transcription can miss contingencies, financing strength, seller credits, or closing terms in a high-value transaction.
Landing test
Join to test whether agents will share redacted past packets and pay for a verified comparison board before a brokerage-wide rollout.
Day-in-the-life pain
The seller wants advice tonight. Your team is still hunting through PDFs.
Five offers arrive before the deadline. One has a stronger net but a risky appraisal clause. Another closes faster but hides a seller-credit ask deep in the addendum. You copy fields into a grid, re-open PDFs, message a lender, and hope the seller sees the tradeoffs clearly.
Input
Upload 3–15 redacted offer PDFs, seller priorities, known lender notes, and the local offer fields your team always compares.
Check
OfferProof extracts terms, flags missing fields, groups contingencies, marks financing strength, and attaches a cropped source snippet to each important claim.
Output
A seller-ready comparison packet: side-by-side grid, tradeoff summary, unresolved-risk checklist, and a clean export for the review call.
Evidence-tied features
Built for the gap between “the offers are in” and “the seller understands the tradeoffs.”
PDF-to-grid extraction
Turn long purchase agreements into comparable fields without rebuilding the same spreadsheet under deadline pressure.
Source-proof snippets
Click any term to see the cropped PDF region behind it, so the agent can verify before presenting to a seller.
Seller-priority scoring
Highlight the offer that wins on net, certainty, timeline, contingencies, rent-back, or whatever the seller actually values.
Ambiguity queue
Separate clear terms from fields that need a buyer-agent, lender, broker, or attorney clarification before the review call.
Packet export
Produce a clean seller-review packet for Zoom, email, or the transaction file without forcing a brokerage system migration.
Proof and cited complaints
What the public evidence says
Hacker News · offer PDFs become spreadsheets
A public HN post describes listing agents receiving multiple 10–20 page offer PDFs, then manually rebuilding a spreadsheet to compare price, net to seller, contingencies, financing, closing timeline, and escalation terms under pressure.
HN comment · trust needs source snippets
A commenter suggested that every extracted field should visually quote the relevant PDF region, so agents can verify a closing timeline or contingency instead of trusting an opaque AI summary.
Adjacent workflow · document chasing is still manual
Another HN discussion describes high-value professional workflows still depending on email, DocuSign, spreadsheets, and manual document follow-up before money moves.
Research caveat · Reddit blocked
Reddit was searched first for this run, but direct fetches returned HTTP 403. This page cites only accessible community evidence captured in the wiki raw file.
Why not existing tools?
This is not a CRM, transaction room, or magic accept button.
Why not use a normal spreadsheet?
Spreadsheets are flexible, but they do not preserve where each field came from. OfferProof keeps the comparison grid tied to the source PDF snippets that justify it.
Can AI safely read purchase contracts?
The first version is agent-reviewed. OfferProof is workflow support and evidence organization, not legal advice or an autonomous accept/reject recommendation.
Will it fit every state form?
Validation starts with redacted packets from one market at a time. The goal is to learn which fields repeat enough to standardize and which must stay broker-reviewed.
Why would agents pay if this happens only sometimes?
One competitive listing can involve a large commission and a high-trust seller decision. Reducing rework and missed details at that moment can be worth paying for.
Early waitlist users get
A concierge review of one redacted past offer packet.
The validation goal is simple: can OfferProof turn a real multiple-offer PDF stack into a comparison grid that agents trust more than their spreadsheet? If yes, the next step is repeatable field templates by market and brokerage workflow.